APS Pays Warning - Documented Evidence

⚠️ Business Practice Warning: APS Pays / Obanc

A Documented Account of Questionable Business Ethics by Credit Card Processing Companies

Purpose of This Page

This page exists to warn other businesses about my experience with APS Pays / Obanc and CEO Wayne Orkin. All claims made here are supported by documentation including contracts, emails, screenshots, court documents, and other verifiable evidence.

Company & Individual Information

Companies: APS Pays / Obanc

Website: https://apspays.net

CEO: Wayne Orkin

LinkedIn: https://www.linkedin.com/in/wayneorkin/

Industry: Credit Card Processing / Payment Services

Service Provided: Offshore Staffing Services - Full-time Employee (40 hrs/week)

Duration: 19 Months of Continuous Service

Why This Matters: A CEO of a payment processing company filed chargebacks for staffing services after 19 months of employment, violating contractual termination requirements and affecting a real employee's livelihood - all while continuing to use those same services.

Executive Summary

Key Allegations:
  • Fraudulent chargeback initiated by CEO of credit card processing companies
  • Violation of contractual 30-day termination notice requirement
  • Chargeback filed AFTER 19 months of successful service delivery
  • Continued use of employee services while disputing payment
  • Unethical business practices affecting real employee's livelihood
  • Abuse of industry position and payment processing knowledge

The Facts: I provided staffing services to APS Pays / Obanc - a dedicated full-time employee who worked 40 hours per week for 19 MONTHS. This was not a one-time service or digital product; this was an ongoing employment relationship affecting a real person's salary and livelihood.

Despite the contract clearly requiring 30 days written notice for termination, Wayne Orkin never provided such notice. Instead, the employee continued working, attending meetings with APS Pays / Obanc executives (documented via screen recordings), while Orkin filed chargebacks for services that were actively being rendered and utilized.

My Position: I believe these chargebacks are fraudulent and represent a breach of contract and abuse of the payment processing system by someone who, as a CEO in the payment processing industry, knows exactly how to manipulate such systems.

Timeline of Events

Initial Agreement

Staffing Agreement Established

Contract signed for full-time offshore employee (40 hours/week). Contract includes 30-day written termination notice requirement.

Employment Begins

Employee Begins Work

Offshore staff member begins full-time work for APS Pays / Obanc, integrated into daily operations and executive meetings.

19 Month Period

Continuous Service Delivery - 19 MONTHS

Employee works full-time (40 hours/week) for 19 MONTHS, attending regular meetings with APS Pays / Obanc executives, completing assigned tasks, fully integrated into company operations. Regular payments processed during this entire period.

Issues Begin

Dispute Initiated Without Proper Notice

Wayne Orkin begins disputing charges WITHOUT providing the contractually required 30-day written termination notice. Employee continues working and attending meetings.

Chargebacks Filed

Fraudulent Chargebacks Initiated

Wayne Orkin/APS Pays/Obanc files chargebacks for staffing services WHILE EMPLOYEE CONTINUES WORKING. No termination notice provided as required by contract. Screen recordings show employee actively participating in APS Pays / Obanc executive meetings during this period.

Current Status

Dispute Status & Employee Impact

Current status of dispute. Employee's salary and livelihood directly affected by fraudulent chargebacks despite continued service delivery.

Documentary Evidence

Below is the evidence supporting my claims. All documents, emails, and screenshots are authentic and verifiable.

1. Original Staffing Agreement/Contract

📄 Original Staffing Agreement/Contract

Key clause: 30-day written termination notice requirement

2. Proof of Continuous Employment (19 Months)

Payment History

19 months of payment records showing regular, consistent payments for services

Work Logs & Timesheets

Documentation of 40 hours/week worked over 19-month period

Project Deliverables

Examples of work completed during employment period

3. Screen Recordings - Employee Working During Dispute

CRITICAL EVIDENCE: These recordings prove the employee continued working and attending executive meetings with APS Pays / Obanc WHILE Wayne Orkin was filing chargebacks.

Executive Meeting #1

Employee participating in meeting with APS Pays / Obanc executives

Executive Meeting #2

Continued collaboration and work delivery

Additional Meetings

Multiple recordings showing ongoing work relationship

4. Email Communications

Contract Negotiations

Initial agreement to terms including 30-day notice requirement

Ongoing Work Communications

Regular work-related emails during 2-year period

No Termination Notice

Evidence showing NO 30-day written notice was ever provided

5. Chargeback Documentation

💳 Chargeback notices filed by Wayne Orkin/APS Pays/Obanc

Show dates filed vs. dates employee was still working

Analysis: Why This Matters

A Payment Processing CEO Filing What I Believe Are Fraudulent Chargebacks - The Ultimate Irony:

Wayne Orkin runs credit card processing companies - businesses built entirely on trust, proper payment handling, and ethical dispute resolution. Yet here are the facts of what I experienced:

The Shocking Details:
  • 19 MONTHS of service: This wasn't a one-time transaction. An employee worked 40 hours per week for 19 months.
  • Contractual violation: The contract explicitly required 30 days written notice to terminate - this was NEVER provided.
  • Continued use of services: Even during the chargeback dispute, the employee continued attending meetings with APS Pays / Obanc executives (documented via screen recordings).
  • Real human impact: These chargebacks directly affected an offshore employee's salary and livelihood - a person who did nothing wrong and fulfilled their duties for 19 months.
  • Abuse of industry knowledge: As a CEO of payment processing companies, Orkin knows exactly how to manipulate the chargeback system - and allegedly did so against a small business providing staffing services.

The Ethical Violation: This is not, in my view, a legitimate dispute over service quality or delivery. The employee worked consistently for 19 months, attended meetings, completed assignments, and was integrated into APS Pays / Obanc operations. Filing chargebacks under these circumstances - without proper contractual notice and while still utilizing the employee's services - represents what I believe to be a fundamental breach of business ethics.

Questions This Raises About APS Pays / Obanc:

  • If the CEO files fraudulent chargebacks against vendors, how does the company treat its merchant clients?
  • Can a payment processor that doesn't honor its own contracts be trusted to properly handle your payments?
  • What does this say about the integrity of leadership at APS Pays / Obanc?
  • How many other vendors or service providers has this happened to?

My Response & Defense

The facts are clear and indisputable. I have fulfilled every obligation under our staffing agreement, and the chargebacks filed by Wayne Orkin/APS Pays/Obanc are, in my opinion, without any legitimate basis.

  1. Contractual Compliance - FULL ADHERENCE:

    Our contract was crystal clear: I would provide a full-time offshore employee working 40 hours per week, and APS Pays / Obanc would pay the agreed monthly rate. This arrangement required 30 days written notice for termination. I provided the employee for 19 MONTHS without interruption. APS Pays / Obanc NEVER provided the required 30-day written termination notice.

  2. Service Delivery - 19 MONTHS OF CONSISTENT WORK:

    The employee worked 40 hours every single week for 19 months. They attended meetings, completed assignments, collaborated with APS Pays / Obanc executives, and were fully integrated into company operations. I have payment records, work logs, timesheets, deliverables, and communications documenting every aspect of this employment relationship.

  3. Continued Service During Dispute - PROOF OF BAD FAITH:

    Most damning: I have screen recordings showing the employee actively participating in meetings with APS Pays / Obanc executives DURING the period when Wayne Orkin was filing chargebacks. This proves they were still utilizing and benefiting from the employee's services while simultaneously disputing payment. This is the definition of bad faith.

  4. No Legitimate Basis for Chargeback:

    Chargebacks are meant for situations where services weren't delivered, were fraudulent, or were significantly different from what was agreed upon. None of these apply here. The employee worked consistently for 19 months, meeting the exact specifications in our contract. APS Pays / Obanc has no legitimate complaint about service quality or delivery - in my view, they simply decided they didn't want to pay anymore, violated the termination clause, and abused the chargeback system.

  5. Impact on Real Employee:

    This isn't just about me as a business owner - Wayne Orkin's actions have directly affected an innocent employee's livelihood. An offshore worker who showed up every day, did their job professionally, and fulfilled their duties for 19 months is now facing salary uncertainty because a CEO decided to abuse the payment system.

🚨 COORDINATED CHARGEBACK SCHEME: Wayne Orkin + Julian Lender

Two Separate Companies, Same Fraudulent Pattern

Email evidence in my possession proves Wayne Orkin orchestrated chargebacks through BOTH his company (APS Pays / Obanc) AND his business partner Julian Lender's company (A+ Dental) for the SAME digital marketing services.

The Coordinated Scheme

This wasn't a single dispute—this was what appears to be a deliberate, coordinated attack using multiple companies to file chargebacks for the same services provided.

The Facts:
  • Service Provided: Digital Marketing Services
  • Two Companies Involved:
    • APS Pays / Obanc (owned by Wayne Orkin)
    • A+ Dental (owned by Julian Lender, Orkin's business partner)
  • The Coordination: Email from Wayne Orkin to me, CC'ing Julian Lender, recommending they charge back for all services
  • Timing: Both chargebacks filed within 5 DAYS of each other
  • Pattern: Same services, coordinated timing, premeditated conspiracy

The Smoking Gun: Email Evidence

📧 EMAIL PROOF: Wayne Orkin Orchestrating the Scheme

What This Email Shows:

  • From: Wayne Orkin
  • To: Service Provider (Me)
  • CC: Julian Lender (owner of A+ Dental)
  • Content: Wayne Orkin recommending they charge back for all digital marketing services
  • Result: Both companies filed chargebacks within 5 days

CRITICAL EVIDENCE: The Email

Email from Wayne Orkin to service provider, CC'ing Julian Lender, coordinating chargebacks

This Email Proves:

  • Premeditation: The chargebacks were planned and coordinated in advance
  • Conspiracy: Direct collaboration between Wayne Orkin and Julian Lender
  • Bad Faith: Using multiple companies to multiply fraudulent chargebacks
  • Intent to Defraud: Not a legitimate dispute—a deliberate scheme to avoid payment

Supporting Evidence

The Coordination Email

Email from Wayne Orkin to service provider, CC'ing Julian Lender

APS Pays / Obanc Chargeback

First chargeback from Wayne Orkin's companies

A+ Dental Chargeback Notice

Second chargeback, filed within 5 days

⚠️ CRITICAL WARNING

If Wayne Orkin coordinated with his business partner to file chargebacks against one service provider, what's to stop him from doing the same to you? The email evidence in my possession demonstrates what appears to be a deliberate strategy, not an isolated incident.

📋 Important Context: Pattern of Behavior Evidence

The federal court case described below does NOT involve my company or my dispute with Wayne Orkin.

However, it demonstrates a documented pattern of behavior by Wayne Orkin in the same industry (credit card processing) using remarkably similar tactics:

  • Manipulating payment systems and processing relationships
  • Filing improper payment disputes after extended service periods
  • Violating contractual obligations and termination procedures
  • Defying proper business and legal processes

This is public record information relevant to assessing Wayne Orkin's business practices and patterns of conduct.

⚖️ FEDERAL COURT CASE: Pattern of Similar Conduct

Wayne Orkin in Previous Federal Litigation - Public Record

United States District Court, District of Massachusetts

Case No. 4:21-cv-40060-MRG | Wayne Orkin found in CONTEMPT OF COURT and sanctioned $20,000 for embezzling hundreds of thousands of dollars from business partner and attempting to subvert federal court orders.

Official Court Findings Against Wayne Orkin

The following information comes directly from federal court documents in the United States District Court, District of Massachusetts. This is not allegation—this is adjudicated fact determined by a federal judge.

Court Case Summary:
  • Case: Wayne Orkin v. Lisa Sue Albert / Boost Web SEO, Inc. v. Wayne Orkin
  • Court: United States District Court, District of Massachusetts
  • Case Number: 4:21-cv-40060-MRG
  • Judge: Margaret R. Guzman, United States District Judge
  • Date of Contempt Order: June 24, 2024
  • Industry: Credit Card Processing (merchant services residuals)
  • Company: Boost Web SEO, Inc. (credit card processing & SEO)

What Wayne Orkin Did (According to Federal Court)

The Embezzlement Scheme:

1. Diverted Business Partner's Residual Income

Wayne Orkin's sister, Lisa Albert, incorporated Boost Web SEO at Wayne's request in 2013. From 2014-2021, credit card processing residuals (commission payments from merchants) were deposited into Boost Web's Wells Fargo account. Wayne had day-to-day control while Lisa handled administrative duties.

2. Used Business Funds for Personal Expenses

Wayne had authority to use Lisa's personal Capital One credit card for Boost Web business expenses. Instead, he ran up $26,000+ in personal expenses, maxing out the card while using Boost Web revenue to cover his personal spending.

3. Retaliated When Caught

In April 2021, Lisa discovered Wayne's "fraudulent activities" and cut off his access to the Capital One card and Boost Web bank account. Wayne's response? Redirect all of Boost Web's residual income to a different company he controlled with a friend.

4. Illegally Redirected Company Income Stream

On May 21, 2021, Wayne contacted CardConnect (the payment processor) and instructed them to redirect residuals that belonged to Boost Web to a company called "MKY FTS Sales LLC," owned by Laith Yaldoo, Wayne's "long time friend" and former CardConnect employee. The funds were then transferred to Wayne's personal account.

5. Amount Embezzled: $638,769.51 + Interest

The federal court found Wayne Orkin liable for conversion (legal term for theft) of $638,769.51 plus $169,691.87 in prejudgment interest = $808,461.38 total.

6. Additional Escrowed Funds: $994,162.25

The court also declared that an additional $994,162.25 in residuals held by CardConnect belonged to Boost Web, bringing the total funds involved to over $1.8 MILLION.

Wayne Orkin Held in CONTEMPT OF COURT

Pattern of Contemptuous Behavior:

Even after the federal judge ruled against him, Wayne Orkin continued to defy court orders, leading to a formal contempt finding:

  • Contacted CardConnect 4 times demanding they withhold funds the court ordered released to Boost Web
  • Misled CardConnect by claiming the court's order was "not clear" when it explicitly stated funds belonged to Boost Web
  • Filed duplicate lawsuit in Florida attempting to relitigate the same issues without telling the Florida court about the federal case
  • Threatened CardConnect with legal action if they followed the federal court's order
  • Acted within 22 minutes of court order—his attorneys threatened CardConnect 22 minutes after the judge ordered funds released

Court's Sanctions Against Wayne Orkin

Contempt Penalties:

  • $8,000 fine to the Court ($2,000 for each of 4 contacts to CardConnect)
  • $12,000 in attorney's fees to Boost Web's counsel
  • Total contempt sanctions: $20,000
  • Warning of additional sanctions for continued non-compliance

Direct Quotes from Federal Judge

What the Court Said:

"Your letter to CardConnect was not only inappropriate, it misstated what we have as a factual basis, a verdict against your client. It is not the plaintiff counsel's place to order [a] nonparty in this case holding monies that were the monies at issue to do anything with them."

— Judge Guzman to Wayne Orkin's attorney (May 2, 2024 hearing)

"Mr. Orkin has engaged in a pattern of contemptuous behavior to the Court and conduct that rises to the level of harassment of a non-party in this action. His persistent refusal to obey court orders and his actions to covertly undermine the judgment of this Court through the Florida Action call for a higher degree of persuasion."

— Memorandum and Order on Contempt (June 24, 2024)

"The Court views Mr. Orkin's lawsuit as nothing other than an attempt to play 'judicial hopscotch' and get another bite at the apple with a different judge because Mr. Orkin did not like the outcome in his case before this Court."

— Memorandum and Order on Contempt (June 24, 2024)

Wayne Orkin's Pattern: Credit Card Processing Industry

Notice a pattern? Wayne Orkin is deeply embedded in the credit card processing industry, and the federal court case shows he used his industry knowledge and connections to:

  • Divert credit card processing residuals that didn't belong to him
  • Coordinate with industry insiders (former CardConnect employee) to redirect funds
  • Manipulate payment processors to his advantage
  • Use his understanding of the system to embezzle over $1.8 million

This is the same person filing chargebacks against YOUR services. The federal court found he embezzled from his own sister's company. He defied federal court orders. He was held in contempt. He manipulated industry connections to steal funds.

Evidence: Official Court Documents

Federal Court Decision

Memorandum and Order on Contempt (June 24, 2024)

⚖️ Court document uploaded

14-page federal court order

⚖️ FEDERAL COURT VERIFICATION

Everything on this page is verified by official federal court documents. This is not opinion or allegation—this is adjudicated fact determined by United States District Judge Margaret R. Guzman.

Case documents are public record and can be verified at:
United States District Court, District of Massachusetts
Case No. 4:21-cv-40060-MRG

The Bigger Picture: Pattern of Behavior - My Experience + Federal Court Findings

When you compare the federal court findings about Wayne Orkin's behavior with Boost Web SEO to what I experienced, a disturbing pattern emerges:

Federal Court Found (Boost Web SEO Case) My Experience (Staffing Services)
Used services from sister's company for 7+ years (2014-2021) Used my employee's services for 19 months
Then redirected payments and disputed obligations Then filed chargebacks against agreed payments
No proper termination or notice provided Never provided contractually required 30-day notice
Continued benefiting from services during dispute Employee continued working in meetings during chargebacks
Credit card processing industry expertise Same - CEO of APS Pays/Obanc (payment processing)
Manipulated payment systems using insider knowledge Filed chargebacks using payment processing expertise
Federal court found conversion, contempt, awarded $808,461 I believe fraudulent chargebacks; dispute ongoing

The pattern is clear: Wayne Orkin uses his position in the payment processing industry to manipulate systems, abuse his knowledge, and avoid paying for services rendered - even after benefiting from those services for extended periods.

Warning to Other Businesses

If you are considering doing business with APS Pays / Obanc or Wayne Orkin, I encourage you to:

  • Review all evidence on this page carefully
  • Get everything in writing with clear terms
  • Document all communications and deliverables thoroughly
  • Consider whether this is a business partner you can trust
  • Research other experiences with these companies
Legal Disclaimer: The information on this page represents my personal experience and opinion based on documented interactions with APS Pays / Obanc and Wayne Orkin. All evidence presented is authentic and verifiable. This page is intended to inform others and share my factual experience. I encourage readers to review the evidence and form their own conclusions.

Disclaimer Regarding Federal Court Case:

The federal court case referenced on this page (Case No. 4:21-cv-40060-MRG) involves a separate dispute between Wayne Orkin and Boost Web SEO, Inc. I am not a party to that case. This information is presented as it is a matter of public record and demonstrates a documented pattern of conduct by Wayne Orkin that is remarkably similar to my personal experience with him. The court documents are authentic and verifiable public records available through the United States District Court, District of Massachusetts.

Distinction Between Cases:

All statements about the federal case are based on official court documents and findings by U.S. District Judge Margaret R. Guzman. All statements about my personal case with APS Pays / Obanc are based on my experience and the evidence in my possession, and represent my opinions and beliefs about what occurred. Where I use terms like "I believe," "appears to be," or "in my opinion," I am expressing my interpretation of events based on the evidence I have.